When Kentaro Takekuma entitled his parody of the Japanese comic book industry "Even a Monkey Can Draw Manga" and discussed the "Shonen Manga Plot Shish Kebob", I wonder if he knew that his analogy of the shonen comic book plot formula as an endless line shit-on-a-stick would eventually apply to the entire comic book creative process?

It's bad enough that so many of the latest serials, both boys comics and girls, look like they were done in Comic Studio in a lab by the same group of art school students following the same manual. But even the title of the parody "Even a Monkey Can Draw Manga" has become an eerily prophetic because now we have ComiPo! - where their motto is that comic creation is a breeze “even if you can’t draw!”
That's right, your don't have to draw - or shade, colour or even trace. The software does it all for you!
They call it a tool to allow "anyone to create high level comic books". I call it a computerized connect the dots for dummies and the bane of an industry that is already shockingly tolerant of boring, derivative, and sometimes downright horribly bad comics.

ComiPo! literally automates every single aspect of the creative process, including character design, plotting and sequencing. In other words, you don't have to have a creative bone in your body to squeeze out a big steaming pile of digital comic book pages.
There isn't any English on the website, but these videos say it all.

Call me old fashioned, but ComiPo! looks more like ComiFaux! to me!!

It's ironic, yet forehead-slappingly appropriate, that Takekuma was brought in by the ComiPo! developers as a consultant to help them create the software that will help further stifle originality, and undoubtedly make it possible for point-and-click trained monkeys to actually make comics.
Takekuma has been pimping ComiPo! and his involvement on his blog heavily, writing again just yesterday and linking to some pages produced with the ComiPo! beta on a moe blog.
That's Takekuma's business and there is nothing wrong with promoting your activities, but it makes his famous parody ring hollow to me now.

Despite what I may think of it now though, the hard truths in Takekuma's parody are still just that, true! Comics, especially those targeted at young boys and girls, are largely shit on a stick. But I think that just makes the good ones shine that much more brightly. Comics have survived relatively well and real creators never tapped out to the industry Juggernaut's relentless formula ground and pound.
However formula and derivative most comics may have become since the 80's, creators and their staff at least have still had to physically draw their comics. Sure many comic creators shamelessly trace backgrounds and use way too many speed lines, screentones and other bullcrap to get around drawing any detail. Sure some abuse every cliché manga motif in the book to cover up a lack of artistic chops too, but at least they still had to draw something!
In fairness - although I don't buy it - it can be argued fairly successfully that the lack of backgrounds and other detail is deliberate to put the emphasis on the characters. I'm not going to even get into that because there is too much to be said on both sides of the argument. However, whatever you happen to believe about that, at least these guys had to work hard to plot, write, design their characters and draw, ink and sometimes colour their comics, regardless of how skilled they were or whether they were following a formula or not. I think we can all agree on that.
If a creator was good their artistry would eventually shine through the confines of formula and they could earn the freedom to do what they really want to later. I think that's the case with comic books anywhere.

Although computer tools like Illustrator and everyman software packages like Comic Studio have made short cuts easier and opened the door for even more wannabe scrubs to get their foot in the door, I think up to now computer tools have been a good thing. Computer tools have made comic creation more accessible to people who have talent but maybe not the resources to get something off the ground, and saved artists hours of time on some of the more mundane and time consuming aspects of their work. There is a lot of crap pumped out of Comic Studio, but I think most people can still tell when someone is really good or is leaning on software to prop up a lack of talent. (And I should know, because I am currently experimenting with Comic Studio for that very reason! Although, I won't be trying to my work off as anything other other than me goofing around on my computer.)

More and more comics, both in Japan and North America, are beginning to have that glazed over look that computers tends to give art. I'm not a fan of the digital look for most comics, but I still think computer tools have been a good thing overall. However, like Piggy's glasses in Lord of the Flies, once clever, useful technological tools are rapidly becoming a means for talentless hacks to take the artistry out of the art of comic book creation and weaken it for the kill.
It's like someone pulling a gun in a fist fight and getting away with it when point-and-clickers who only need know the right mouse button from the left are even talked about in the same breath as artists who still put pen to paper. It's nuts that fast food crap like ComiPo! is being accepted so widely - and if you don't think it is, come to Japan and look around! Garbage pop-art that looks just like ComiPo! is everywhere!!

I admit that although I haven’t been much of an artist since junior high, I'm one of the first to bitch about shitty art in comic books. It is a graphic medium, after all. But as a former wannabe artist I'd support unpolished, mediocre or formula art that someone did their best to draw over some slick, computer processed cookie-cutter piece of shit belched out of a ComiPo! template any day!

Artists, please shoot this crap down with a salvo of originality and put the scrubs back in their places! I still believe the real comic book fans will eventually be on your side. For those of you who can write but can't really draw, please don't go down the ComiPo path to creative purgatory. Find an artist or just write regular books - you know, the kind without pictures. Remember those? Writing is an art too, albeit an under appreciated one.

Please! Just say "No!" to ComiFaux!

Trackback address for this post

Trackback URL (right click and copy shortcut/link location)

7 comments

# SDShamshel on 10/28/10 at 15:38
I think you're over-exaggerating the impact ComiPo! would have on comics creation even at an amateur level.

When I was young I had a friend with an animation program. It was a lot like ComiPo! in that it had a bunch of pre-set characters, animations, and backgrounds, but it's not like it stopped us from being creative. We thought of all sorts of stories and ideas based on the limitation of having the visuals determined for us to such a great extent, and much fun was had. And it didn't warp my perception of how animation is made either.

I don't think anyone looks at ComiPo! and thinks that it'll be the key to their comics career. It's something to use when you want to quickly hammer something out, or to deliver a quick joke, or to test your mettle by reveling in the stylistic limitations of the program. So while your comparison with Comic Studio is understandable, I don't think you have anything to worry about.
# gottsuiiyan [Member] Email on 10/28/10 at 15:44
SDShamshel,

Thanks for the comments.

I hope your right. If it ends up just being a fun tool for people to mess around, that's great.

But a lot of "pro" stuff looks suspiciously like this in Japan already.
Also, ComiPo! makes a big point of pushing the marketing aspect of being able to create your own comics. This is not intended to be a glorified Etch A Sketch for manga fun. They seriously want to make this thing big, which I think is part of the reason they brought in Takekuma. Otherwise, why bother?
# Tsubasa on 10/28/10 at 16:41
Big on amateur level, obviously.

It's not like anyone will actually get anything done with a program like this published - or even try to do that, for that matter. And it's not like people are claiming that the Vocaloid software has stopped the influx of people who want to be singers.

I don't see what the fuss is about. Next year probably no one will even remember the whole thing anymore.
# gottsuiiyan [Member] Email on 10/28/10 at 17:09
Tsubasa,

Honestly I hope you're right. But that's what I thought about Comic Studio when I first saw it! I figured it was just software for wannbes like me!
Unfortunately, a lot of recent comics in the weekies - ones that are being published! - are shamelessly computer-assisted. A lot of pop-art and illustraion looks exactly like ComiPo! - the difference being that up to now people have had to learn how to draw that cookie-cutter art.

All I'm saying is that this type of thing is becoming more and more accepted in Japan and it isn't good. Seriously, take a look at new serials in the weeklies (boys or girls) and I think it's fairly obvious.

Maybe I am over-stating things. But to reference your example, why would Vocaloid stop the influx of people who want to be singers? It's the complete opposite! More and more people who have no business singing think they can be pros!! Vocaloid and it's derivative products aren't just toys or amateur. It is huge business! Virtual idols and their products make money over here, and idols with synthesized voices are mainstream.
Non-synthesized idols just sing in groups so large that you can't tell they suck anyway - just like vocal layering and synthesizing in a studio - so eventually what will it matter which one it is? What is the distinction between 'idol' and 'singer' in Japan anyway? The lines blur more every year.

I'm just saying that if people stop caring whether comics were actually drawn or not, the art will die. Based on some of the things getting published in the weeklies, people are evidentially caring less and less.
# Tsubasa on 10/28/10 at 17:28
I'm predicting that if this thing takes off we'll see tons of truly horrible amateur comics, even more meme comics in 2chan, and a few truly amazing online works that really surpass the limitations of the software and alone justify it's existence. Which is all fine and good.

I find it hard to believe that any editor would accept stuff that's made completely on a software like this. So we'll see.
# gottsuiiyan [Member] Email on 10/28/10 at 17:36
Tsubasa,

Cool. That may be exactly what happens. That would be just fine by me too! In fact, I'd love to see someone take that software and make it do something impossible.

Based on the shonen/shojo serials I've seen lately, however, I don't have the same faith in the editors you do!

Yes, we will see.
# HABE on 10/29/10 at 04:37
Anything that enables as many people as possible to get involved in their comics hobby is a good thing. That's what keeps comics alive.

As a writer, I think ComiPo could be useful for fun, ephemeral things I could do myself. It could never replace a real artist for serious projects, but I don't think that's what it's for anyway. It's more like a cool toy that lets anyone play.

If you're right that manga has already become "boring, derivative, and sometimes downright horribly bad" it's hard to see what more damage ComiPo could do. If anything I'd expect it to encourage real artists to strive to achieve more original styles and techniques.

I don't see a downside to this.

Even in a worst-case scenario, comics created using ComiPo could never be as truly awful as the best Poser-based comics that are out there now. Yet Poser didn't ruin comics, and ComiPo isn't likely to either.

Comments are closed for this post.

Random bloggings of Japanese things, translations of things, and my ramblings about those and other things.

gottsuiiyan.ca site menu

gottsu-iiyan.ca portal
Gottsupedia

Uniqlock

Twitter

Search

XML Feeds

Who's Online?

  • Guest Users: 4
free blog tool